Re: 65802 vs. 65C02?

[jon@i-manila.com (Jon Co)]

I read somewhere that the //c+ came with some sort of built in
accelerator.  could be causing your timing to be somewhat off ?  I
never had a //c+ so I couldnt really verify this for sure.  I do have
a //c+ keyboard which I plan to transplant into my //c one of these
days.
steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius) wrote in message news:<9307085f.0303191003.22118123@posting.google.com>...
> Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.spamless.net> wrote in message news:<3E787D6A.9020304@telus.spamless.net>...
> > Dosius wrote:
> > 
> > > All the docs I read said that the IIc+ came with the '802... :\ I
> > > think I saw '802 ops in the ROM, but I'm not sure.  I thought maybe
> > > that was why I got that freaky crash loop when stuffing the IIc+ ROM
> > > into the //c emulation.
> > > 
> > > -uso.
> > 
> > I've had my IIc+ apart and it has a 65C02.
> > The November 1988 issue of Incider claims it has a 65C02.
> > Or here's where Apple says it has a 65C02 and describes the
> > differences between the IIc and IIc+
> > http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=1814
> > 
> > Wayne
> 
> Sorry...I must remember that not every source I read is reliable :) 
> If it comes from Apple, it must be reliable.  (BTW, Apple said in the
> //c Owner's Manual I have that the //c had a 16K ROM, and damned if I
> didn't find a version of the //c ROM which I was able to pare down to
> 16,128 bytes and still get to work quite well!)
> 
> Well, that makes it a *little* easier - no need to hack in a subset of
> the '802 for the //c+.  I'll look at that article, and see if there is
> any other info out there, if I STFW, that will tell me what
> differences might be causing this weird behavior, and I might be able
> to get the //c+ to work in Dapple ][ in the future.
> 
> -uso.