[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LDA C08C,X
Why are you not happy? Please read my post above: "EOR 02D6,Y For Disk
II Family Again". I have found the solution that the Beneath Apple ProDOS
manual is completely wrong that it confuses all of us while we are trying to
figure out.
PROM code does make sense to me.
Our BRAIN lost our memories back to the time for Apple II Family since
it is never available to us today. It is TIME for us to locate our BRAIN so
our memories can come back. We will be able to write manuals in a very
clear context reading while many manuals are already out of print that will
NEVER be available. It can be very HARD to find.
It is why everyone and I share our minds in the newsgroups so we can be
able to construct short and long FAQs that will provide more information
which it will be available NOW. What do you think?
--
Yours Truly,
Bryan Parkoff
BParkoff@satx.rr.com
"Holger Picker" <pickerh@uni-muenster.de> wrote in message
Pine.A41.4.44.0302251258230.82542-100000@zivunix.uni-muenster.de">news:Pine.A41.4.44.0302251258230.82542-100000@zivunix.uni-muenster.de...
> On 25 Feb 2003, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
>
> > Date: 25 Feb 2003 02:51:04 GMT
> > From: Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com>
> > Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
> > Subject: Re: LDA C08C,X
> >
> > And if you have already found a $D5 and an $AA, and then fail to find
the $AD
> > that you expect, then you have found _nothing_, and should scan further
for
> > another valid address mark. It is certain that there will not be a
valid data
> > mark before another address mark occurs, since you have either just
passed
> > it (and misread the $AD) or have somehow managed to misread something
else
> > as a $D5 and $AA, since the $D5 cannot validly occur except in prologs.
> >
> > Scanning for a data header is only justified when you have _just now_
found
> > an address mark. Once you have reason to be uncertain of your position
on
> > the track, the only appropriate thing to look for is an address header.
> >
> > -michael
> >
> > Check out amazing quality 8-bit Apple sound on my
> > Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/
>
> I think, I got the point, sir, though I am not quite happy with it. ;-) As
> far as I can see, the program will always start looking for another
address
> mark in case of an error because there is nothing else it could do anyway.
> (It's the "nothing else" that annoys me.)
> Thanks for your help sorting this out.
> Kindest regards
>
> Holger
>