Re: header pin numbering

[Marsha <menacechgo@aol.com>]

[posted and mailed]

Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.spamless.net> wrote in 
3E5AEAD9.4000807@telus.spamless.net:">news:3E5AEAD9.4000807@telus.spamless.net:

> I�ve seen boards with 40 pin headers like the one on the
> TransWarpGS marked on the board with any of these numbering
> schemes. Any opinions as to which is preferable in this case?
> 
> 
> 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1
> 
> 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

If it connects to the CPU slot this numbering is more appropriate...
it matches the ordering system of the expansion slots and as used on most 
integrated circuits including the W65C816.

Marsha