[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transwarp GS vs. Zip GSX
- Subject: Re: Transwarp GS vs. Zip GSX
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 02:00:33 -0600
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 80,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
- References: <121791b5.0212311823.6450f234@posting.google.com> <aavQ9.110959$E_.59185@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:25781
Tim Haynes wrote:
I guess it depends... Zip is better for size and heat (i.e. it runs cooler
than Transwarp and is smaller, with less chips). However, you can speed up
the Transwarp if you are so inclined. Can you speed up Zip...? I'm not
sure...
Yes.
Some Zips can do 14 mhz or faster.
Alas, thus far mine only does 10 mhz.
Roy
Tim
"Paul H. Lee" <earnhardtfanpl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
121791b5.0212311823.6450f234@posting.google.com">news:121791b5.0212311823.6450f234@posting.google.com...
Which ACCELERATOR is better? I just want the opinions of the
community... sounds like an interesting subject to me.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----