[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel vs 6502

Subject: Re: Intel vs 6502
From: Greg Weston <gwestonREMOVE@CAPSattbi.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:47:30 GMT
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: AT&T Broadband
References: <D6qcnXXgbfYbAZKjXTWQkQ@giganews.com> <GN6Q9.308$Cp7.97@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
User-agent: YA-NewsWatcher/5.0.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:25727

In article <GN6Q9.308$Cp7.97@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>, Kelli
Halliburton <kelli217@crosswinds.not> wrote:

> The 68000 series did not include an internal floating point system until the
> 68040. Motorola floating point accelerators included, if I recall correctly,
> the 68851, 68852,

These are PMMUs. Or at least the 851 was. My 68000 Family Reference has
no 852.

> 68881, and 68882. I believe, but I'm not sure, that they
> were designed to be the companions respectively of the 68000, 68010, 68020,
> and 68030.

The 68881 went with the 68020. The 68882 went with the 68030. There was
no FPU option for the 68000 or 68010.

G

References:
- Intel vs 6502
  - From: "Bryan Parkoff" <BParkoff@satx.rr.com>
- Re: Intel vs 6502
  - From: "Kelli Halliburton" <kelli217@crosswinds.not>

Prev by Date: Get the full scoop on MacWorld
Next by Date: Re: Get the full scoop on MacWorld
Previous by thread: Re: Intel vs 6502
Next by thread: Re: Intel vs 6502
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread