[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes

Subject: Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)
Date: 9 Dec 2002 15:47:55 -0800
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
References: <68a2ec1b.0212031533.58b2ffca@posting.google.com> <vbednZ6OrbaIBHCgXTWcpg@comcast.com> <51CdnQFVIaB3_WmgXTWcow@comcast.com> <68a2ec1b.0212090838.6d206603@posting.google.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:25134

me@lazilong.com (Lazarus I. Long) wrote in message news:<68a2ec1b.0212090838.6d206603@posting.google.com>...
> "Joel" <joelbuckley54.nospam.@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<51CdnQFVIaB3_WmgXTWcow@comcast.com>...
> > I did a little searching.
> > I came across 3 different versions of DOS 3.3 on a 3.5 disk.
> > 
> > AmDOS
> > OzDOS
> > UniDOS
> 
> what i'd like to know is, regardless of how the software runs, are the
> *formats* the same for all three?  I mean, can they all *read* each
> other's disks?  ie: they all use 32 sectors and 50 tracks with the
> VTOC on {$11, $0}?  I can verify that UniDOS does.

I have an interest in trying and will try UniDOS and AmDOS on ApplePC and Dapple. :ï¿½

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
  - From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>

References:
- Size of DOS 3.3 800k volumes?
  - From: me@lazilong.com (Lazarus I. Long)
- DOS 3.3 400k volumes
  - From: "Joel" <joelbuckley54.nospam.@hotmail.com>
- Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
  - From: "Joel" <joelbuckley54.nospam.@hotmail.com>
- Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
  - From: me@lazilong.com (Lazarus I. Long)

Prev by Date: Re: GS ram disk
Next by Date: ProTalk and Steven
Previous by thread: Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
Next by thread: Re: DOS 3.3 400k volumes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread