[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones



Jalapeno wrote:

In article <jalapeno1-9F5AF8.18135514072002@nnrp04.earthlink.net>,
 Jalapeno <jalapeno1@mac.com> wrote:


It doesn't matter. Apple Computer was sued by Apple Corps in 1989 for violating a 1981 agreement not to market audio/video products with recording or playback capabilities, just so they could continue to use the name "Apple". The Ensoniq "on board" was a doomed concept that probably shouldn't have made it past the legal department at Apple in the first place.

Just to expand on this, take a look at Apple Computer Inc.'s trademark web page:

http://www.apple.com/legal/guidelinesfor3rdparties.html

Scroll down to the section entitled "Music Software Exception" and read that.

Apple Computer Inc. can still get into hot water if the term "Apple" is used with any _software_ from 3rd party developers. Think how much trouble they'd be in if they started putting synthesizer chips into iMac computers.


The way Apple Computer should deal with this is simple:
Buy Apple Corps Ltd.

Roy