[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
"Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net> writes:
>Yes, I also found this very interesting and educational. I didn't know the
>details of why IBM clones were legal but Apple clones generally weren't. I
>thought IBM facilitated the cloning.
The problem with cloning the Apple // firmware is that there are no INT
vectors - all the monitor routines are at fixed addresses. This makes it
difficult to replicate without using the same instructions. Had the monitor
been written with a jump table at the front it would have taken up more space
and been more easily cloned.
--
David Wilson School of IT & CS, Uni of Wollongong, Australia
- References:
- The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
- From: guyvf@usa.net (guy-jin)
- Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
- From: "Bryan Villados" <news002@macgeek.org>
- Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
- From: "Roger Johnstone" <rojaws@mac.com>
- Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones
- From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>