[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opcode Instruction Question
- Subject: Re: Opcode Instruction Question
- From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Date: 29 Apr 2002 01:29:20 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
- References: <WA0z8.135879$ro5.11790128@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:19153
Bryan Parkoff asked:
> Do you think that CISC uses a lot of instructions that might take little
>longer to process however RISC uses a less of instructions that might
>increase great performance. I think that 65816 is like CISC while 68K is
>like RISC. What do you think?
Wow. This is tantamount to flame bait! ;-)
The 68K family is more like a VAX than anything else, and is _definitely_
in the CISC camp. The debates are endless, but a pretty good test is
whether there are operations that work on a register with a memory
operand (as opposed to just another register operand).
RISC machines are sometimes called LOAD/STORE machines, because
the only instructions that reference memory are LOAD and STORE
instructions. All data manipulation instructions are register-to-register,
typically producing a result in a third register.
Read some of the _extensive_ literature on this topic--some is quite
enlightening, and some is merely confusing.
BTW, there is a good case for Seymore Cray inventing the first RISC
architecture--the CDC 6600.
-michael
Email: mjmahon@aol.com
Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/