[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ROM Question
- Subject: Re: ROM Question
- From: russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto)
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 01:10:07 -0000
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Disorganized
- References: <Wz5p8.317755$uv5.27501036@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:18508
In article <Wz5p8.317755$uv5.27501036@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>,
Bryan Parkoff <BParkoff@satx.rr.com> wrote:
>ROM Question
>
> Are an original Apple I's ROM and Apple II's (Not II+) ROM the EXACT
>same. The 6502 machine language is ALWAYS same. Is it possible that
>assembly language like monitor routine remain unmodified for I and II, but
>it did make some modification for II+ and later. Please advise.
No, they are completely different.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
=====
Every time you buy a CD, a programmer is kicked in the teeth.
Every time you buy or rent a DVD, a programmer is kicked where it counts.
Every time they kick a programmer, 1000 users are kicked too, and harder.
A proposed US law called the CBDTPA would ban the PC as we know it.
This is not a joke, not an exaggeration. This is real.
http://www.cryptome.org/broadbandits.htm