[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum

Subject: Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
From: barrym95838 <barrym95838@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <d9c9e5eb-e10d-4fb3-ab2d-ee119169fa6a@googlegroups.com>
Injection-date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:15:30 +0000
Injection-info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.66.18.28; posting-account=LutruAoAAAATsnFU5eS3mBdP_JaNBOzH
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <47419b36-48c6-4846-8a8d-6f1d3edda6cd@googlegroups.com> <a200e0ca-2322-478e-b1a4-0da1b7d31eae@googlegroups.com> <50851ad5-01f7-44f3-b4d6-3e8e052f9e04@googlegroups.com> <d9c9e5eb-e10d-4fb3-ab2d-ee119169fa6a@googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0

> You assume $fd..$fe are set to 0 because they are unused ZP locations?
> 
Hi Antoine.

Please correct me if I'm being foolish, because I've never done anything in 65c816 assembly, but wouldn't bank "wrap-around" make the base vector in $fd(e) irrelevant, as long as he's check-summing all 64k?

Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
  - From: Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>

References:
- creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
  - From: retrogear <larrygr510@gmail.com>
- creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
  - From: Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>
- Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
  - From: retrogear <larrygr510@gmail.com>
- Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
  - From: Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>

Prev by Date: Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
Next by Date: Re: Syndicomm Scam
Previous by thread: Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
Next by thread: Re: creating a new Apple IIgs ROM 03 checksum
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread