[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: low level format on a lisa?



Mike Pfaiffer <pfaiffer@mts.net>
>
> Although we might have a friendly disagreement with what the most
> appropriate course of action was it still remains friendly. Paul and I
> will probably come to accept we disagree with each other. That's fine.

I agree with that.  But there is no point to your objecting to my posting
Lisa-related messages here, because I'm going to continue to do it.  So
what's your objective? This would have been quickly over and done with,
information imparted, except for the "you can't do that/yes I can"
exchanges.  By extending that after the impass was clear,  you are really
doing what you said I shouldn't do- post Lisa-related messages.

>
> Both you and Paul bring up valid points about unsupported Apple products
> (other than the Apple// and Apple///) having few places to go for help.

It's not the unsupported part. The Lisa is from '83, and appeals to the same
group of people who collect Apple II's and ///'s.  It could be considered
the Apple IV.
That, and the reality that it doesn't justify it's own group makes this as
logical a place as any to ask and answer questions.
So loosen up a little. It's not like Lisa questions will ever comprise any
significant portion of the newsgroup's traffic. (not including messages
complaining about Lisa questions/answers!)

> The way the company is going, it no longer supports 68K machines at all
> and may not support Power Macs either. This might be reflected in the
> Mac groups. In fact I asked a question about a Mac plus. The people in
> the Mac group I used thought it was a new Power Mac.

Oooooo! I get to commit another transgression! Here's a good source of info
on 68K Macs.  They can answer any Plus question you might have:

To subscribe to the Classic Macs mailing list, send an email to
<Majordomo@hitznet.com>. In the body of the message write:
subscribe classics
You will be added within a day.

-Paul