[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Apple ][ was cool!

Subject: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
From: "Mo" <mygranny@'nospam'swbell.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:58:58 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy
Organization: SBC Internet Services
References: <3B511638.E704ED11@usa.net> <3B530194.2AAAC1D8@swbell.net> <ZF7FzMCcxxU7EwGV@cosine.demon.co.uk> <9ivr4r$t2v$1@plutonium.compulink.co.uk> <3B5469A6.959A272F@swbell.net> <9k1cgf$eqc$1@venus.itns.co.za>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11746 comp.sys.cbm:19239 comp.sys.sinclair:46491 comp.sys.tandy:3720

Apple ]['s were not cool- they just thought they were. In fact, most of the
Apple ]['s I knew had a tendency to run extremely hot.
8-)

Mo





"As soon as your through changing, you're through."  -Jack Tramiel

References:
- The Apple ][ wasn't crap!
  - From: Jeff Thomas <a2forever@usa.net>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: Jason <tmr@c64.org>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: "Jon-paul" <pockets@cix.co.uk>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: Stephen Shaw <xstephenx@apple2.org.za>

Prev by Date: Re: Berkley Software
Next by Date: Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?
Previous by thread: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Next by thread: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread