[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?



william strutts (wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com) wrote:
: > Then throw in some sort of decoder for the 64-256MB chunk.  Since

: Memory Management Unit which really extends the addressing
: the processor has.  [...] However, you would then need to
: develop a MMU and the added cost of R&D would increase your
: cost to build.  It would be safer to just move to a 68020
: or 68030 processor and bypass the smaller bus.

Perhaps I'm oversimplifying things here but, assuming 1MB
pages into this secondary memory, wouldn't an 8 bit register
attached to a decoder suffice?

As per the 68020 and 68030: it sounds great wrt speed and
functionality, but what would be the cost in complexity (for
the end user, of course)?

This is, in essence, a machine which I would want the user
to be able to pull apart and modify, if they so desire,
without a degree in electrical engineering.  I have seen
people modify the old 8-bitters, and there are people who
will modify (for example) the TI-89/92 calculators (which
are based on the 68000).  I have not encountered people who
go to such trouble for i386 or later, or the PowerPC.  Just
peeking into the processor manuals for those beasts is very
intimidating.  I can hardly imagine what a complete set of
documentation for a modern PC would look like, if such a
thing existed.

Byron.