[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?
- Subject: Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?
- From: David Cantrell <usenet-20010705@barnyard.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:08:57 +0100
- Newsgroups: alt.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.advocacy, comp.sys.amstrad.8bit, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.atari.advocacy, comp.sys.atari.st, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair
- Organization: This space intentionally left blank
- References: <9ikva3$ple$1@nereid.worldonline.nl> <3b4e9f7b@news.hunterlink.net.au> <9inog6$mbq$1@nereid.worldonline.nl>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.amiga:1510 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:21760 comp.sys.amstrad.8bit:3664 comp.sys.apple2:10756 comp.sys.atari.8bit:6849 comp.sys.atari.advocacy:584 comp.sys.atari.st:14026 comp.sys.cbm:18300 comp.sys.sinclair:44923
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:33:27 +0200, "T.J.T van Kooten"
<thomas@-nospam-worldonline.nl> said:
>Having used Pascal myself I would have to agree on using a system like
>Delphi. Although my heart these days is with Python. But that's a script
>language ( I wish i had this as a kid, so clear and well structured!)
I don't know why people insist on calling languages like python and
perl 'script' languages. Just because some people use them as that
does not mean that that is all they can do. I have written some
rather large applications in perl, and colleagues have done the same
in python. They are fully-fledged programming languages.
--
David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david