[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dbase II on an AII ?
Dbase wasn't a relational database until DB IV. It
simulated a relational DB on the prior versions. It wasn't
a true relational DB until version IV. You might be
thinking of Foxpro which was relational before DB IV.
--
--
William R. Strutts - wrstrutts1@home.com - Whatever!
C'est moi! http://www.facelink.com/wrstrutts
Just hacking away...
"John King" <joki@eskimo.com> wrote in message
news:9ebj40$463$1@eskinews.eskimo.com...
> dBase II was relational, at least on the PC's if definitely was.
>
> Curious -- when you're running under CP/M on the Apple 2, can you read and
> write to ProDos disks too?
>
>
>
> <tturner@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message 3b08ac1e@ecn.ab.ca">news:3b08ac1e@ecn.ab.ca...
> > Rick (nomail@nomail.com) wrote:
> > : Thug wrote:
> > : >
> > : > "Rick" <nomail@nomail.com> wrote in message
> > : > 3B081D60.122AB70@nomail.com">news:3B081D60.122AB70@nomail.com...
> > : > > Does anyine remeber if it was possible to run dBase II on an Apple
> II
> > : > > with a Z80 M$ Softcard?
> > : >
> > : > Yes it was. I had many dBase II databases running under Z80
Softcard.
> > : >
> >
> > : Thanks.
> >
> > : > > Also, were there any other relational DBs fot the Apple II?
> > : >
> > : > Many. Appleworks for one!
> > : > There was also one by Infocom called CornerStone or something like
> that, and
> > : > one called DB Master I think.
> >
> > : Appleworks is a flatfile database. Were the others relational or flat?
> > <snip>
> >
> > --> I thought dBase wasn't fully relational until v4.x - which would
> > leave-out the last A2 version (v2). There were several flatfile
> > databases - which don't count if you're determined to have an A2
> > relational database program. And yes, my DB Master Professional
> > indicates right on the box that it's relational. I know of none
> > other for the A2 - but there may have been.
> >
> > --
> > E.A.G.L.E Librarian A3 BBS:403/481-3133
> email:tturner@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
>
>