[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OMG!
The case, Worldwide Church Of God v. Philadelphia Church Of God, illustrates
some of the points about "value" of a work with respect to old Apple II
software. Here is a pointer to the opinion for anyone who is interested.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/04485f8dcbd4e1ea882569520074
e698/c4ebac1fea4173048825695e005d6ab4/$FILE/9955850.pdf
"Roy and/or Janet Miller" <millers@inetnebr.com> wrote in message
3AF728FE.BB1A5148@inetnebr.com">news:3AF728FE.BB1A5148@inetnebr.com...
> Frank Townsend wrote:
>
> > First, why do you think that such a case would stand a good chance of
being
> > dismissed? i.e., what part of copyright law do you believe depends on a
> > copyright holder showing a "continuous interest" in a copyrighted work?
>
> Recently I posted a reference to a story in the Wall Street Journal which
> concerned copyright law.
- References:
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>
- Re: OMG!
- From: a2mg@aol.comNomail (The Apple II Mail Group)
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Kelli Halliburton" <kelli217@crosswinds.not>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "J.Q.P." <jqp@hotmail.com>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Kelli Halliburton" <kelli217@crosswinds.not>
- Re: OMG!
- From: Bruce.Baker@juge.com (Bruce Baker)
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Sheldon Simms" <sheldon@interprice.com>
- Re: OMG!
- From: CUTjefbla@bconnex.net (Jeff Blakeney)
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Sheldon Simms" <sheldon@interprice.com>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Frank Townsend" <ftownsen@iamdigex.net>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Sheldon Simms" <sheldon@interprice.com>
- Re: OMG!
- From: "Frank Townsend" <ftownsen@iamdigex.net>
- Re: OMG!
- From: Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>