Re: ORCA/C

["Sheldon Simms" <sheldon@interprice.com>]

Im Artikel <20010502185537.27030.00002047@ng-ma1.aol.com> schrieb
"MikeW50" <mikew50@aol.com>:


>> Anyway, my biggest problem with Orca C wasn't ever the small deviations
>> from ANSI ...
> I guess I missed the original thread because I sort of tuned out on yet
> another defense of indefensable piracy.
> Surprisingly enough, ORCA/C has actually been updated relatively
> recently. While I have nothing planned in the near future, I won't rule
> out another upgrade. For that reason as well as personal edification,
> I'm curious about your comments.

I wasn't repeating old rumors, I was repeating my old experiences. But
yes, I do have an older version. As for updating, well it seems hard to
imagine that I would actually use Orca C for anything at this point, so
it's not just worth it to me.

-- 
sheldon@semanticedge.com  "The term (denotation t) denotes the object denoted
                           by the object denoted by t." -- KIF