Re: Nathan Mates (was Re: OMG!)

["Sheldon Simms" <sheldon@interprice.com>]

Im Artikel <20010426012340.04031.00000824@ng-mn1.aol.com> schrieb "The
Apple II Mail Group" <a2mg@aol.comnomail>:


>>suggest that they
>>consider "swimming with the stream" by regarding the net as the most
>>potent "viral" distribution method
> Already did that, with every good intention of uploading a ton of great
> stuff. Uploaded a few things, then the pirate took over and _he_
> uploaded a ton more. So, why bother? Who the heck does this clown think
> he is?
>>if you've got along without
>>it all these years, then you're not going to buy it NOW.
> I receive a couple of requests per week. I don't sell them anything. I
> don't even answer the e-mails.  ;-)

So basically what you're saying, if I understand correctly, is that
someone uploaded stuff that you were going to upload anyway, and because
you didn't get to feel the power of control over when exactly it was
uploaded, you decided to hold back everything out of spite?

-- 
sheldon@semanticedge.com  "The term (denotation t) denotes the object denoted
                           by the object denoted by t." -- KIF