Re: Godel Goofed? Nope.

[olcott <olcott@qwest.net>]

Please Read this whole thing through before responding.

>>>You forget.  You don't like recursive specifications.  :D
That invalidates everything!  <<<

This is the PROOF of your deceit. I
NEVER said that I don't like recursive
specifications, you are LYING  about
this. This is no form of honest mistake,
either, its ONLY an fully intentional LIE !!!

With many people I could call this an
unintentional mistake, they don't have the
intelligence and education to avoid errors
such as this. In fact with these people,
if I used the word recursive at all, they
would not even be able to remember it
from one second to the next... They would
have No Idea what this word means, and
not even be able to mistake it for another
word that sounds similar, not knowing
any of these words either.

In you case we have quite the opposite, you
did not err, as an honest mistake, a man of
your intelligence and education ONLY makes
these kinds of "errors" with full intention to deceive...

I did not say that I do not like recursive
specifications. I said that the INFINITELY
RECURSIVE nature of both the Liar Paradox,
and Godel's Incompleteness Theorem, invalidates
that they are statements...  You must have
a very low sense of self-esteem to stoop so
low as to CHEAT at conversation.... There
is no actual basis for this low self-esteem,
you are both quite intelligent and educated...
Try to know this fact fully throughout your
whole being... You are a man of value...