Re: Macintosh LC...need info on this =) TIA

[Matt Jenkins <mdj@bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au>]

Kelli Halliburton <kelli217@crosswinds.not> wrote:

> 128
> 512(KE)
> Plus
> SE
> II
> IIx

> No other models. The reason behind this is that the IIgs was still in
> production during the time these machines were.

Hmm, the IIgs was still in production up until 1993, which would multiply
your list by 5.

I think a better idea would be a list such as comp.sys.mac.old so the
people who want to participate can, and the Apple II people who don't
care don't have to.

Cheers,

Matt

-- 
              Matt(hew) Jenkins. Computer Science (RMIT Bundoora)
                           email: mdj@cs.rmit.edu.au
                            -- Site of the Month --
                            http://www.gnustep.org/