Re: Rarity and Pricing

["Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>]

Jeff Blakeney <CUTblakeney@home.com> wrote in message
news:3a1b4d83.130848785@24.9.0.17...
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:36:45 -0800, "Christopher N. Russell"
> <chrisrussell2k@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Looking through auctions and newsgroup posts, I could only ponder about
the
> >value of Apples and their rarity. Personally, the rarity of Apple IIs, in
my
> >opinion, goes like this, in order from rarest to most common:
> >
> >Apple ][, original (not upgraded rom)
> >Apple ///+
> >Apple IIc +
> >Apple II +
> >Apple ///
> >Apple IIgs Woz
> >Apple IIe, IIc, IIgs are about the same rarity
>
> I'd probably put the Apple /// as being more rare than the Apple II+
> but I don't have any data to back that opinion up.
>

I agree. I've passed up many opportunities to aquire more II +'s, but have
found only 2 each of the Apple /// and IIc +.
-Paul