[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs

Subject: Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.bc.ca>
Date: 2000/10/07
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <39DDEB7F.2C63D39E@topmail.de> <e9BD5.139$Gs4.203369@news.pacbell.net> <eRHD5.5062$mC.318113@monger.newsread.com>

The IWM on my ROM 1 & 3 IIgs are 28 pin chips.
The SWIM  on my Super drive card and a couple of Macs I checked
are 44 pin chips. Which Macs used a 28 pin SWIM?

    Wayne

"Matthew T. Russotto" wrote:

>
> It ain't what you don't know that gets you, it's what you do know that
> ain't so.  The original Mac II used the original IWM.  The Mac IIx and
> subsequent machines used the SWIM (Sanders-Wozniak Integrated Machine,
> or sometimes Super Wozniak Integrated Machine).  They are pin
> compatible.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com (Matthew T. Russotto)
- Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)

References:
- IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: Patrick Schaefer <patrick.schaefer@topmail.de>
- Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: "Charles Stephens" <charles_stephens@hotmail.com>
- Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
  - From: russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com (Matthew T. Russotto)

Prev by Date: Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
Next by Date: Re: 120 year life span predicted
Previous by thread: Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
Next by thread: Re: IWM and un-suitable drives for Macs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread