[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building An Apple ][ Software Archive
- Subject: Re: Building An Apple ][ Software Archive
- From: Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>
- Date: 2000/09/29
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <8q6dgs$tng$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <NZFA5.744$j13.76682@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net> <8r0e1g$sgd$1@merope.saaf.se> <FWRA5.834$j13.84788@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net> <8r1i72$dhk$1@merope.saaf.se> <It5B5.940$j13.94363@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net>
Frank Townsend wrote:
> The Top 10 New Terms for Free Software
>
> 10. GRATISWARE
> 9. TAKE-IT-FOR-NOTHING-WARE
> 8. GELTLESSWARE
> 7. NOPAYWARE
> 6. MYTREATWARE
> 5. WON'T-PUT-YOU-IN-DEBTWARE
> 4. ON-THE-HOUSE-WARE
> 3. NO-JACK-NEEDED-WARE
> 2. SANSFEEWARE
>
> . . . AND THE NUMBER ONE NEW TERM FOR FREE SOFTWARE [drum roll . . .]
>
> "THE-UN-MOOLA"-WARE
>
> By the way, botanically tomatoes *are* fruits. Next, you'll be telling me
> that the morning start is not a star!
Well, the morning star is a planet (Mercury or Venus) but I really don't know
about the morning "start"!! :-)
>
>
> "Paul Schlyter" <pausch@saafNOSPAM.se> wrote in message
> news:8r1i72$dhk$1@merope.saaf.se...
> > In article <FWRA5.834$j13.84788@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net>,
> > Frank Townsend <ftownsen@iamdigex.net> wrote:
>
> > I think there's a need for a word which means "commercial freeware
> > and public domain software", i.e. all software which legally cna be
> > used for free. I've used "freeware" for years to mean just that.
> > But I suppose I should stop since so many others attach a somewhat
> > different meaning to the word "freeware". So I'm asking you: what
> > word your you want to use instead? Free-of-charge-ware? That should
> > communicate the meaning OK, but it sounds too clumsy. Any other
> > suggestions?
> >
> >
> > > Like categorizing tomatoes and apples as "red
> > > fruit" (pardon the pun ;-))
> >
> > Tomatoes aren't fruit -- they're a vegetable....