Re: Sick And Tired of SHK

[fadden@spies.com (Andy McFadden)]

In article <zMey5.101257$Ur3.1220901@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>,
Ernest <ernestls@home.com> wrote:
>The fact that .SHK and .SDK files take so much time and effort to figure out
>how use must be why the new Tarnover site will only carry them. They don't
>want to encourage piracy, so they only support file types that are as almost
>impossible to use. That's got to be the logic. DSK images are easy to use,
>so it will make piracy easy. SHK images are not worth the extra time, so
>pirates will go else where. Is that the logic that the Tarnover "advisors"
>used to stop the DSK images from being allowed on the site?

Why are they hard?

Visit http://www.nulib.com/, grab the binaries for you favorite system
(or sources and build your own), run "imgconv" to convert SHK disk images
to 2MG.

-- 
Send mail to fadden@fadden.com (Andy McFadden)
CD-Recordable FAQ - http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/ (a/k/a www.spies.com/~fadden)
Fight Internet Spam - http://spam.abuse.net/spam/ & news.admin.net-abuse.email