Re: Apple II benchmark

[supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)]

"Penman" <anonymous@cotse.com> wrote:

>I seem to remember a test with the ZipChip 8, and the
>upshot was that the 65c02, being a more efficent
>processor than the x86, they said that the
>8mhz chip was comprabable to a 33mhz 386, as far as
>doing the same number of instructions per second.
>Does anyone else remember this one?

I don't remember that, but I had a ZipChip 8 in my
IIe at the time and I can say that it was a lot faster
than the Turbo AT (16Mhz 286 I think) a friend had
doing most stuff.