[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dates


Jeff Blakeney wrote:

>
>
> You didn't mention the Apple III+.  I have no information on it other
> than the fact that it was in production for a very short time.

I was including the Apple III largely because of the A2 emulation.
However if we had access to a III+ we'd find a spot for it at the AGM.
We're happy enough getting an Apple III with a profile hard drive there.

> You might also want to at least mention the Apple II clones.  There
> are lots of them but a couple of the big names were Franklin and
> Laser.

I really wasn't going to write up a history of the Apple II, just a card by
each machine describing it.

>
> >Thought about the II+, however that's really just a ROM upgrade to the
> >II.
>
> Well, the II+ did have its own case as well and I think a lot more
> people used Apple II+ machines than Apple II machines.

I'd tend to agree, however there is a space limitation at our AGM.  Since
most
people there will be Mac users and unfamiliar with the distinction, we
thought
lumping the II & II+ together would be acceptable enough. A fair portion of
the
people there will never have seen an Apple II before.