In message <37EF0021.1315C133@swbell.net> Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net> writes: <snip> > However, it should be obvious that, in order to prosecute someone for a > violation, there needs to be a violation. (If there is not, you just end up > wasting resources and looking silly.) Exactly. And you would think that WOULD be obvious too ;o) -- Eric <chippys@nospam.earthlink.net>