[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TWGS SRAM?
- Subject: Re: TWGS SRAM?
- From: Jonathan Schattke <wizwom@ripco.com>
- Date: 1999/04/19
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Ripco Communications Inc.
- References: <uDAS2.3003$JM2.194168@newsgate.direct.ca>
Herbert Fung wrote:
>
> Well while I'm figuring out how I'm getting a 14MHz chip I was thinking about
> about upgrading the SRAMs while I'm at it. Currently I have the AE 8/32K cache
> board and it comes with 35ns SRAMs. Now after reading some of the FAQs most
> of them mention usages of 15-20ns SRAMs. After browsing around some web pages
> I found a listing of some SRAMs at 10-12ns. Now is there any problems running with
> faster SRAMs or should I stick with 15ns?
No, the speed on a RAM chip is the fastest it can be addressed and will
present or accept data. Using a faster chip will not hurt in any way -
you could put 60ns DRAM in a ][+, but it would still act like 250ns.
--
\ /\ / If you aren't happy,
VVizVVom - Wandering Kernel of Happiness it's not my fault.
~~~> homepage at http://www.ripco.com/~wizwom <~~~