Re: ADT, we have a problem...

[ecitnerppa@aol.com (Ecitnerppa)]

>> My feeling is that ADT's machine language portion was not written for the 
>> //gs's Zilog UART - if this is so, what do I need to patch in the ML
>portion, 
>> or would it require complete re-assembly?
>> 

I've long ago heard about perhaps a ][gs compatable version of ADT being worked
on, but never heard the results. Who knows. Maybe a few bytes or bits could
mean the difference between compatability or not. In the long run, some more
extensive work probably  needs to be done if a ][gs version is ever to go
beyond 19.2Kbit.....