Re: Appleworks, Asimov, SQC, etc.

[pfg@cs.rmit.edu.au (Paul Francis Gilbert)]

GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH (Henrik 'Ratte' Gudat) writes:

>In <358E13A6.639F1592@swbell.net> Rubywand writes:

>>      So far, it appears that Asimov has been much more direct and honest
>> in dealing with Apple II users and copyright owners than have its
>> attackers. 

>Thanks for the joke of the day.

>- henrik

Indeed, if you look hard enough in life, there's of things that are TRUE
that you might find amusing. I think it's ironic:
- On one side we have Asimov who is dealing with copyright owners as honestly
  as it can whilst still maintaining an archive of out of date Apple software.
- On the other we have people like Nathan Mates, and lets be fair to him,
  is a self-confessed criminal, who constantly slanders people, breaks
  usenet equitte, and deliberately lies when it suits his case.

Which out of the two do you find more honest? Clearly Asimov in my opinion.


--
Paul Gilbert           | pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au (The DreamMaster)
Bach App Sci, Bach Eng | The opinions expressed are my own, all my own, and
Year 5, RMIT Melbourne | as such will contain no references to small furry
Australia	       | creatures from Alpha Centauri.