Re: Asimov: incompetent or malicious?

["TheDM" <thedm@sunflower.com>]

Gee Nathan maybe he's a site adminstrator who dosn't own an apple // and
only handles file management and security issues.  He didn't have to answer
this forum at all. Seems like he did everyone a favor, he removed the
product in question, he apologized, and he showed his face in our forum, and
best of all, we wont have to hear you complain about it anymore.



Nathan Mates wrote in message <_oUf1.772$bj2.3826437@ptah.visi.com>...
>In article <slrn6o02pl.t4i.modus-dejanews@ns.asimov.net>,
>Patrick Michael Kane <modus-dejanews@pr.es.to> wrote:
>>Intrec contacted me and the image in question was removed.
>
>   Why the heck was it "allowed" to be published in the first place?
>Anyone with half a clue as to the Apple II software scene knew that
>Proterm was always commercial, and still for sale. Basically, are you
>simply clueless, or are you a jerk out to try and shaft companies?
>
>Nathan Mates
>
>--
><*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
># What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
># Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
># think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? -R.A.
Heinlein