Re: Asimov: incompetent or malicious?

[modus-dejanews@pr.es.to (Patrick Michael Kane)]

Ding ding ding!

Give the man a prize!

On Thu, 11 Jun 1998 13:56:41 -0500, TheDM <thedm@sunflower.com> wrote:
>Gee Nathan maybe he's a site adminstrator who dosn't own an apple // and
>only handles file management and security issues.  He didn't have to answer
>this forum at all. Seems like he did everyone a favor, he removed the
>product in question, he apologized, and he showed his face in our forum, and
>best of all, we wont have to hear you complain about it anymore.
>
>
>
>Nathan Mates wrote in message <_oUf1.772$bj2.3826437@ptah.visi.com>...
>>In article <slrn6o02pl.t4i.modus-dejanews@ns.asimov.net>,
>>Patrick Michael Kane <modus-dejanews@pr.es.to> wrote:
>>>Intrec contacted me and the image in question was removed.
>>
>>   Why the heck was it "allowed" to be published in the first place?
>>Anyone with half a clue as to the Apple II software scene knew that
>>Proterm was always commercial, and still for sale. Basically, are you
>>simply clueless, or are you a jerk out to try and shaft companies?
>>
>>Nathan Mates
>>
>>--
>><*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
>># What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
>># Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
>># think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? -R.A.
>Heinlein
>
>


-- 
Patrick Michael Kane
<modus-dejanews@pr.es.to>