Re: Boycott Microsoft

[nospamhattonr@aug.com (Rick)]

bobsun <seebelow@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

> > Vendors not being allowed to replace the IE icon with another one?
> 
> Was true, but no longer. Vendors always had the option of installing
> their own choices of applications/icons.

Was true? OK, evenif it WAS (and not IS) that was still anti-competive
predatory business practice.

> 
> > Web sites only allowing access to IE browsers on W95?
> 
> Never saw one. But isn't that the choice of the web site? What do
> propose/ a web gestapo going around puttting a stop to this "antisocial"
> behavior?
 
Disney Blast
> 
> Now that your misunderstandings about the situation have been clarified,
> I'm certain that you will modify your position on the topic. right??
> 
Read the suit against microsoft. Its posted on the net. sinece I have no
misconceptions, I have nothing to change.

-- 
***   To reply remove nospam from my return address.   ***