Re: *More* proven piracy on asimov, supporters are liars

[whocares@whocares.com (whocares@whocares.com)]

On Wed, 29 Apr 1998 18:34:21 GMT, nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)
wrote:

>In article <1998042904240900.AAA10432@ladder03.news.aol.com>,
>Supertimer <supertimer@aol.com> wrote:
>>There is something wrong with the Asimov argument when PT3.1
>>is being pandered on the site.  

Thanks for the pointer.  I just downloaded it.

BTW, I didn't see any "pandering", just a bunch of antique software
for obsolete computers.

Get over it already.