[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NeXT step Openstep??
- Subject: Re: NeXT step Openstep??
- From: wsmith@NOSPAM.ctron.com (Will Smith)
- Date: 1998/04/01
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Cabletron Systems Inc.
- References: <6frv4s$jf9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35224746.416245452@roch-news> <6ftq7m$ckh$1@elna.ethz.ch>
On 1 Apr 1998 16:32:53 GMT, GUDATH@EZINFO.VMSMAIL.ETHZ.CH (Henrik
'Ratte' Gudat) wrote:
|>> they are operating systems for NeXT machines... i think OpenStep is a
|>> version that is ported to other platforms.
|>
|>NextStep is the OPENSTEP (I'm not yelling, that's how it's written)
|>implementation for NeXT computers. OPENSTEP is also available for Suns and has
|>been nuked very recently. This particularly sad because it was very well done.
|>The OPENSTEP implementation for Suns is called OpenStep.
thanx for setting me straight on that one... :)
|>Rhapsody is based on NextStep. This one is great stuff. People who hate Apple
|>usually hate Rhapsody as well, regardless of the fact that NextStep/Rhapsody is
|>one of the few great things that can come across a programmer's life.
|>(I'm not saying everyone has to love it, just admitting Jobs' employees have
|>accomplished something useful would be sufficient.)
this is what i've heard, but somebody was ranting about how Rhapsody
was dead. i wonder if that's true, or if Apple (read: Jobs) is just
planning to kill off the version for Intel machines....
what i've heard about Rhapsody is certainly impressive. i'm very
interested in seeing what happens.
---
William Smith
#include <disclaimer.h>
Remove the obvious when sending e-mail...