Re: Rubywand's new award! Plus, Answers

[wsmith@NOSPAM.ctron.com (Will Smith)]

On Fri, 06 Mar 1998 18:13:59 GMT, nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)
wrote:

|>>SPAM is defined as wasted bandwidth, right?  i see nothing
|>>constructive in flames, and as such, they (flames) fall neatly into
|>>the "SPAM" category....
|>
|>   Nope. Spam == UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email), where people try
|>and separate you from $ in your pocketbook. See http://www.cauce.org
|>for more definitions, and what's being done to try and stop it.

what about the poor souls who have to pay for the amount of
information that comes across their wire?  THOSE people are,
effectively, being seperated from their $$ by flames....
..especially when the flamer doesn't have the sense to edit out long
parts of a message when they don't apply...

have a good weekend...

---
William Smith
#include <disclaimer.h>
Remove the obvious when sending e-mail...