Re: Rubywand's new award! Plus, Answers

[wsmith@NOSPAM.ctron.com (Will Smith)]

On Thu, 05 Mar 1998 13:14:30 -0500, sheldon@atlcom.net (Sheldon Simms)
wrote:

|>Sorry. Spam != Flame.

i'm inclined to agree with LJSILICON on this one.  SPAM is defined as
wasted bandwidth, right?  i see nothing constructive in flames, and as
such, they (flames) fall neatly into the "SPAM" category....

if one wanted to get wierd about it, flames would be a SUBSET of the
SPAM category....  :)

---
William Smith
#include <disclaimer.h>
Remove the obvious when sending e-mail...