Re: *Still* nothing Apple II related from Macintosh Inc

[Richard Kilpatrick <photon_digital@lovecraft.demon.co.uk>]

In article <698eel$c0b$1@scramble.lm.com>, Matt Portune <mportune@telera
ma.REMOVETHIS.com> writes
>In article <6947tn$n2j$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>, pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU 
>(Paul Francis Gilbert) wrote:
>>Some of us would like to read an interesting Mac titbit occasionally without
>>your ranting and raving.
>
>Yes, but isn't that what comp.sys.mac.* is for?  I thought that's how usenet 
>worked.

Yes, but on the whole if one Apple 2 user thinks that it is of interest,
then a lot will. Whereas subscribing to an entire mac newsgroup just for
a little bit of occasional info merely wastes bandwidth and subjects the
reader to yet more infighting and flames and spam.

Richard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Photon Digital - photon_digital@lovecraft.demon.co.uk

      Acorn Risc PC, WIndows and Mac OS imaging with alternative platforms.
 Camera tests, multimedia products featured in every issue, technique, examples.
                   Tel: 44 1573 226032 Fax: 44 1573 226000