Re: OS For IIGS

[airmaster@KCUF.org (KCUF airmaster)]

On 27 Nov 1997 00:30 -0500, spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector) wrote:

>In article airmaster@KCUF.org writes...
>
>>On 25 Nov 1997 16:19 -0500, spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector) wrote:
>>
>>>>KCUF airmaster (airmaster@KCUF.org) wrote:
>>>>: The Mac is just an art-deco paperweight.
>>>>
>>>>If this is true, then a Windoze machine is a waste of the metal
>>>>of which it is made.
>>>>
>>>>I currently work on computer sales at a major American university.
>>>>The computers, in terms of functionality, go like this:  UNIX, Mac,
>>>>Windoze.  In that order, from top to bottom.  When UNIX crashes (well,
>>>>actually, it hasn't yet).  When the Mac crashes, we reboot.  When
>>>>the Windoze machine crashes, we get a technician from service to spend
>>>>three hours trying to even _diagnose_ the problem.  And the Windoze
>>>>machines
>> 
>>You're hallucinating.  I work on both platforms all the time and for stability,
>>the Windows platforms are superior in _every_ way.  I can't imagine calling a
>>Macintosh "functional" and not calling myself "incompetent" in the same breath
>>for saying so!
>
>    Be careful when you attribute quoted lines of text, I did _not_
>write the above, Tilghman Lesher did. If you go back in the thread
>you'll see I responsed to his comments and stated how I felt quite
>strongly against what he said.

Many apologies!  Not intended at all that way.





KCUF airmaster
<http://www.kcuf.org/radio/index.html>
net radio: punk, jazz, metal, ambient 
underground music 24-7-365 worldwide