Re: Solutions in Modernizing GS (Re: Problems in "Modernizing" a //gs)

[pubpc1@library.ucla.edu]

bjblackbear@ibm.net (B.J. Major) wrote:
>Scott G.:  I will forward these comments onto Lewin Edwards.  I'm sure
>he'll have much to say about them as he himself has programmed *many*
>Amiga items and still uses that platform himself on occasion.

I read his reply and noticed he did not answer most of the points
in the post (see my reply to it).

Why is it that both you and he seem to think that the Mac is the
best computer in the world and rag on everything else, PC, GS, or
Amiga?  His previous posts were all attacks on the PC and the GS
and his current reply is an attack on the Amiga.

Sheesh, Mac users!

-Scott G.
(P.S. I happen to think that Umax [but not Apple] MacOS machines
are better engineered than most PC clones, but I don't hold much
hope for them.  They make superior machines to Apple and Apple
won't stand for that for long.  While Rapsody is a much needed
boost [heck, it is basically NeXT with a new face and the same
microkernal, Mach; that's why I was saying NeXT does wonders for
an Intel machine], the first step is to admit your shortcomings.
MacOS, as it currently is [not Rhapsody] has problems.  Why can't
Mac users admit that?  Don't believe me that I admire Umax clones?
Ask Mitchell: I had a big debate with him on csa2 just a few
weeks ago defending the Umax line against PC criticism.)

-Scott G.