[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Codename G-OS
- Subject: Re: Codename G-OS
- From: Ernst Stavro Blofeld <SPECTRE@jhu.edu>
- Date: 1997/10/25
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations, comp.sys.amiga.programmer, comp.sys.amstrad.8bit, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.m6809, comp.sys.msx, comp.sys.oric, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy
- Organization: SPECTRE
- References: <62o7lh$lfk@alexander.INS.CWRU.Edu> <3450E7DB.MD-0.198.zhulien@alphalink.com.au> <877729132snz@spheroid.demon.co.uk>
Brian Watson wrote:
> Am I the only one to be worrying about a HAL that will be ready by 2001?
Probably. We passed his birthday at the beginning of the year (April
1997 I think). I wouldn't be surprised if IBM, in some secret back
laboratory, put together a supercomputer they named HAL...and nobody
will never know.
But what's this about an 8-bit graphical user interface? This is
rediculous. 8-bits don't have the power to push pixels. And if you
want some GUI for yours, there already are some (GEOS, Apple). Whoever
started this string, clean up the cross-posting. Amiga, for one, was
NEVER 8-bit!
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Codename G-OS
- From: James Coupe <james@obeah.demon.co.uk.SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMEGGSCHIPSSPAM>