[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
- Subject: Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
- From: sheldon@atlcom.net (Sheldon Simms)
- Date: 1997/10/13
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: none
- References: <61380i$bhd$1@client2.news.psi.net> <619d3i$lt3$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <61bnsk$f80@login.freenet.columbus.oh.us> <61eklj$4pi$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <61eliv$4nk$1@darla.visi.com> <61h2ui$5jt$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <swhite-1010970943430001@pulm-mac2.bsd.uchicago.edu> <61rqtl$ftp$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <nugundamEHyz5x.EIG@netcom.com> <61s76c$1ik$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
In article <61s76c$1ik$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (Paul Francis Gilbert) wrote:
> If you don't agree, I don't suppose you'd see any harm in me making a new
> drink and calling it "Coca Cola". Or perhaps making a new computer and
> calling it the "Apple //"? If you honestly think there's nothing wrong with
> this, then man have I got some prime Florida real-estate for you! ;-)
Both of those are registered trademarks. "the comp.sys.apple2 FAQ" is
not. That's why you can do the latter, and not the former.
--
W. Sheldon Simms III | 2000 is *still* the 20th century
sheldon@atlcom.net |