Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna

[misek@execpc.com (Bill Misek)]

On 8 Oct 1997 22:54:10 GMT, pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (Paul Francis
Gilbert) wrote:

>nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates) writes:
>
>>In article <61eklj$4pi$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
>>Paul Francis Gilbert <pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> wrote:
>>>Agreed. The point to notice is that Nathan was given FAQ maintainership
>>>by the c.s.a2 community. 
>
>>   Bzzzzzt! Wrong! Look, silly, when the heck are you ever going to
>>put forth a fact that's in any way near correct? When you do do that,
>>instead of just opinions masquerading as "gospel", we'll be sure to
>>alert the media.
>
>In contrary to YOUR informed opinions, I suppose? I'm going to refrain
>from trying to get into an insult match with you... that seems to be
>your response to anyone whose opinions differ to yours.
>
>Are you seriously saying that you obtained FAQ maintainership without
>the CSA2 community's knowledge? Did God come to you in a vision and say
>"Nathan Mates, thou shall maintaineth the CSA2 FAQ."? Did you do a secret
>deal with the previous maintainer to take over without the knowledge of
>the CSA2 community? 


God (in a booming voice): NATHAN!!! I wish thee to take thy holy csa2
faq and make it your own. Moldth and shapeth it in thy own image.

Nathan (humbly of course): My lord, of course I will.

God: That is good my child. We both know that the a2 is the one true
sacrament and it must be kept from the unclean.

Nathan:  I shall  try my best to keep your holy word from the pagens
who take your name in vain. Damn them all.

--
Bill Misek                   Never worry about the bullet with     
                             your name on it. Instead, worry about 
misek@execpc.com             shrapnel addressed to 'occupant'.     
                                 -- Murphy's Tenth Military Law    
http://www.execpc.com/~misek