Re: New FAQ sites? (was Re: Nathan does it again!)

["matthew p. conte" <spam@somebody.else>]

Charles T. 'Dr. Tom' Turley <cturley@grin.net> wrote:
> Matt,
> He's not talking about anonymizer.com. Nathan has that blocked also :)
> He's talking about another that Nathan does not have blocked - perhaps 
> you should email Bill on it.  It works just fine for accessing Nathans 
> blocked pages.

a)  nathan hasn't blocked me from viewing his pages...  i was just making
anonymizer.com known for those who could not view them.  sorry it didn't
work.
b)  i don't buy new apple stuff, purchase new shareware, etc.  i'm
perfectly content with my GS setup as it stands, and my interest in apple
lies merely in the fact that i contribute to the XGS emulator project.  i
have no real need to view nathan's pages.  i enjoy the occasional helpful
reply by someone who doesn't refer the inguisitor to the FAQ.

i come here for comic relief and for drama.  i've _never_ seen a newsgroup
with a weirder psyche...  where else can i see middle-aged people act like
children?  both "extreme" sides here need to wrap this ages-old tiff up and
shut up or go away.  that's for the nathans _and_ the turleys.

late/matt.
-- 
   _  _ _______________________ _  _
  [itsbroke.at.ix.dot.netcom.dot.com]   "simple solutions created by black
  broke | XGS-DOS | PC Atari Emulator     and white thinking - too bad the
  \[http://www.netcom.com/~itsbroke]/          world not work that way..."