[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More old apple // identification questions.
- Subject: Re: More old apple // identification questions.
- From: dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)
- Date: 1997/05/10
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: The Greater Columbus FreeNet
- References: <5ku3ab$cch$1@nntp.igs.net>
Thomas Krahn (tkrahn@king.igs.net) wrote:
: I had posted a little while back asking to identify my apple //s.
: Here are a few more detailed questions:
: -What is the sequence of apple name plates. Mine says "apple" with no
: "][" or "][+". Which computer is this for?
The ][ and ][+ had very similar looking nameplates...a nameplate right in
the center of the front of the lid, with the apple logo, and the phrase
"apple ][" written in that nifty Cupertino font. The ][+ had the word
"PLUS" printed in green right above the "][". Spelled out...it was not "][+".
: -What markings should be on the motherboard? for the ][ or the ][+?
: Who is the manufacturer "unitron"? My apple has "Unitron" on the
: motherboard. Is this a replacement? or was the manufacturing contracted
: out?
(don't know about that one)
: -Were applesoft ROMs only put in the ][+ or did they also get put in the
: ][?
The ][ had Integer BASIC in ROM; the ][+ had Autostart ROM and Applesoft
BASIC in ROM. I know some people with Apple ]['s upgraded them so that
they effectively became ][+'s with a ROM transplant; also, both Applesoft
and Integer BASIC were available on ROM cards. The problem with using the
ROM card is that then you can't have a Language Card, which means that you
can't run Pascal or ProDOS. But you can have both BASICs.
--Dave Althoff, ][.
(I've worked with both ]['s and ][+'s, but it has been a very long time)
--
/-\ _ _ *** New season begins TONIGHT! ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /XX\_ _ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ _/XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\__/XXXXX\/XXXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\_/XXX\_/\_/XXXXXX