Re: [RFC] Reclassification list

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <5ecf7i$otb@milo.vcn.bc.ca>, Gareth Jones <gareth@vcn.bc.ca> wrote:

[Snip... talking about verified lists of once-commercial software
now made publicly available]

>When you've got a good collection together, I'm sure that it would find a
>home with the other FAQs.

   Quite true. I'm quite willing to provide either disk space for a
list (actual programs would reside on ftp sites like caltech or
ground), or a link to such a list from the FAQs if the maintainer
wants to put it up elsewhere.

   Note that at the moment, I'm letting someone else come forward
and build such a list. I've got a lot more technical set of FAQs
that I'd prefer to be working on in my "spare" time. Someone want
to take up this job?

Nathan Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein