[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review - WordPerfect IIgs



In article <5e2d69$1s82@uni.library.ucla.edu>,
 <pubpc1@library.ucla.edu> wrote:
>So far, we've only got mixed replies trying to get confirmation from
>Corel.  When they get back to us (Bruce Maples, myself, and everyone
>else who are bombarding them) with a statement that we can archive
>together with the program, it will be uploaded to the regular ftp
>sites and the binaries.  :)

   Tip: read all of csa2 before posting, and hopefully you have a news
server with article latencies under 12 hours. Turley posted yesterday
that his earlier statements were (not unsurprisingly) wrong,
Wordperfect is *still* copyrighted and not public domain.

   Turley and the truth are rarely found together to begin with.

Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein