[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review - WordPerfect IIgs



Nathan Mates (nathan@visi.com) wrote:
: In article <5e2d69$1s82@uni.library.ucla.edu>,
:  <pubpc1@library.ucla.edu> wrote:
: >So far, we've only got mixed replies trying to get confirmation from
: >Corel.  When they get back to us (Bruce Maples, myself, and everyone
: >else who are bombarding them) with a statement that we can archive
: >together with the program, it will be uploaded to the regular ftp
: >sites and the binaries.  :)

:    Tip: read all of csa2 before posting, and hopefully you have a news
: server with article latencies under 12 hours. Turley posted yesterday
: that his earlier statements were (not unsurprisingly) wrong,
: Wordperfect is *still* copyrighted and not public domain.

:    Turley and the truth are rarely found together to begin with.

Nathan Mates and correct grammar are rarely found together.

Now that we've pointed out all of Dr. Tom's faults, the NEW target
is (drum roll please) Mr. Nathan Mates.  Let the criticisms begin!

--
__ __|_) |       |                    
   |   | |  _` |   \   ` \   _` |   \ 
  _|  _|_|\__, |_| _|_|_|_|\__,_|_| _|
          ____/