Re: AppleWorks GS

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.961115200641.10823A-100000@moose>,
Paul Schultz  <pschultz@med.wayne.edu> wrote:
>On 13 Nov 1996, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>> A word processor like AppleWorks GS which doesn't use QUITE as much
>> direct page space, would make THIS user VERY HAPPY... :-)

>MultiScribe GS is basically the AWGS WP with a few more bells and
>whistles. Perhaps (and I would assume) it uses less direct space
>memory.

   Not totally sure on the "more" characteristic. It's got a few
things like shape drawing (mostly useless, imho) that got split off to
AWGS's page layout, but was done first, and probably has a few more
bugs/quirks.  I haven't used it in years, so I can't say much about it
now.

Nathan Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein